Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Rudd's hospital reform more radical than 1984 Medicare revamp 

Rudd's hospital reform more radical than 1984 Medicare revamp

The Prime Minister's $30.9 billion overhaul to integrate Australia's health system goes much further than his simple pledge before the last election to "fix" the public hospitals.

Kevin Rudd is proposing steps to integrate the health system in radical changes, of a scale which transcends Australia's last big health revamp, Medicare, in 1984.

Not only is he proposing to radically change Australia's heavy dependency on hospitals, he is also planning to establish a new "independent umpire" at arms lengths from government, to set "efficient national prices" of health services to be paid for by federal and state governments.

The Rudd Government is seeking to REDUCE not increase use of public hospitals, thus easing the strain, by putting in place a more efficient, integrated arrangement which, it is hoped, will spur people to be treated by less expensive primary health, (ie outside hospital) services.

He is hoping to assuage the hostility of some states, particularly Victoria, to change by promising dollops more money for both hospital and primary care.

Rudd is promising to double the Commonwealth's contribution to efficient hospital services by promising to pay 60 per cent of the efficient running cost --- up from the 40 per cent level recommended by his own National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission.

Canberra would also pay 100 per cent of the efficient price of primary health care services as part of a package he says will "permanently reverse" the decline in Commonwealth funding of public hospitals.

The federal Government will also directly fund "local hospital networks" (sounding familiar to the current Victorian arrangements) to "break down the barriers" in the system and deliver better integrated care.

These go much further than what was expected.

The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission, which delivered its report to the Government nine months ago, called for a shift towards a "one health system" to end the blame and cost-shifting inherent today. The commission urged the Federal Government to take over 100 per cent of the efficient cost of hospital outpatient services and pay 40 per cent of the efficient cost of every public patient admission to a public hospital, with that percentage figure to be increased incrementally to 100 per cent.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size




RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How could you trust the federal labor government in running our hospitals? After stuffing up the insulation scheme, the solar rebate scheme and the school infrastructure program, wasting billions through mismanagement, they claim they can save us money and fix our health system. People want to believe that federal intervention will fix the health system. I believe Labors plan will add another level of bureaucracy and waste. The whole system needs to be taken over and streamlined. This means 100% not a 60/40 share with the states.
Posted by One Nation Riverina, 19/03/2010 1:29:09 PM
With the loss of life and waste of Millions of dollars in the insulation fiasco just imagine what this will be, once again rush, rush rush, spend spend,spend. I thought this was an original promise prior to election, one that might have forethought and consulation, not everything on the run as usual.
Posted by Don at Devonport, 15/03/2010 11:42:34 AM
GO RUDDY YOU ARE THE MAN!
Posted by Big Tas, 13/03/2010 8:55:29 AM
I wonder if there are anymore money trees available, I'd like one too Mr Rudd. We end up paying for it, so let's get everyone a job first, then we can afford it. We aren't all gullible fools.
Posted by Mamamia, 10/03/2010 8:31:07 PM
This will be just another failure . I suppose the voters are getting fed up of this show pony ...He is a real Mr Magoo !
Posted by NIKI , 10/03/2010 8:53:05 AM
Sounds like a starting point to an election. Just another build up promise, that will be forgotten when its all over. Well at least he is off that stupid money grab he called Carbon trading. Now that was a money spinner.
Posted by Paulus, 8/03/2010 4:11:33 PM
Not sure that an extra layer of bureaucracy would make the health care system more efficent as some states are already struggling with a 3/2 ratio of bureaucrats to staff .
Posted by Waylander, 8/03/2010 8:31:07 AM
So why stuff around with 60%. By doing this the buck won't stop with you Mr Rudd because guess who won't take the blame when there is a fall at the hurdle. Get rid of ALL the double dipping if you want the glory BUT! stop this political merry-go-round masquerade and do it properly and be honest to the Australian people. Or next time when in scrubs put the big red nose on (and the hard hat)
Posted by Charlie, 7/03/2010 7:30:38 PM
Despite my being privately insured for `Top Hospital', I was still out of pocket to the tune of $1800 for a simple surgical procedure. When doctors refuse to operate on non-insured patients, there is no other option. Hence, I'm awaiting a National Health System which guarantees all patients prompt access to essential medical and surgical treatment in any hospital in Australia. Given Rudd's current poor track record, will this will be the case?
Posted by Marie Jacqueline Lee, 7/03/2010 11:25:04 AM
I might be inclined to think the federal governments proposed takeover of all our hospitals was a good idea if an election wasn't looming. Could this be another half baked scheme - very similar to the home insulation, planet saving one? Kevin Rudd has shown a real talent for spin - especially where he can get the phrase "for working families" into the script.
Posted by Full Montie, 7/03/2010 5:43:43 AM
1 | 2  |  next >
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
Kevin Rudd. Photo: Andrew Meares
Kevin Rudd. Photo: Andrew Meares
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

1) Apple iPhone 4 16GB55 plans 4%
2) Apple iPhone 4 32GB52 plans 9%
3) HTC Desire4 plans 2%
4) Samsung Galaxy S43 plans 4%
5) Apple iPhone 3GS 8GB37 plans 1%

Mobile Phones | Broadband Plans

Get the best deal at Fairfax Digital - Rural Press



Central Midlands & Coastal Advocate







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...